Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[lexical-link] Bug Fix: Removing a link from descendants #6656

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

levensta
Copy link
Contributor

Description

At the moment it is possible to delete LinkNode only when children are TextNode. But if there is another node inside the link above the text, deletion will not work.

With this PR I fix this behavior and show how it works using the MarkNode example (via adding a comment) in lexical-playground

Test plan

Before

before.mov

After

after.mov

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
lexical ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 21, 2024 9:30pm
lexical-playground ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 21, 2024 9:30pm

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Sep 21, 2024
Copy link

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
lexical - cjs 29.85 KB (0%)
lexical - esm 29.66 KB (0%)
@lexical/rich-text - cjs 38.3 KB (0%)
@lexical/rich-text - esm 31.55 KB (0%)
@lexical/plain-text - cjs 36.9 KB (0%)
@lexical/plain-text - esm 28.86 KB (0%)
@lexical/react - cjs 40.04 KB (0%)
@lexical/react - esm 32.91 KB (0%)

@ivailop7 ivailop7 added the extended-tests Run extended e2e tests on a PR label Sep 22, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@etrepum etrepum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logic looks like it's probably correct, but it would be nice to have a bit of test coverage!

There's probably some efficiency that could be gained by checking only the anchor and focus parents, otherwise the LinkNode itself would be present in the selection's nodes.

@ivailop7
Copy link
Collaborator

+1 on a test covering this use case

Copy link
Contributor

@potatowagon potatowagon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to merge! have noted the test case addition todo here: #6665

@potatowagon potatowagon added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into facebook:main with commit 2889ccd Sep 25, 2024
46 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. extended-tests Run extended e2e tests on a PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants