Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GammaGamma to tau tau inclusive cards #3308

Open
wants to merge 41 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

michael-pitt
Copy link
Contributor

@michael-pitt michael-pitt commented Nov 29, 2022

Dear expert,

I've produced gammagamma->tautau inclusive production madgraph cards at 13TeV, which included BSM weights, and are used for g-2 measurement of the tau lepton.

For inelastic photons. the MSHT20qed_nnlo_inelastic set is used:

lhapdf = pdlabel   ! PDF set
26500 = lhaid        ! if pdlabel=lhapdf, this is the lhapdf number

For elastic photons hadronic survival probabilities with charge forma factors were used based on gamma-UPC model, and implemented using:

2      =  lpp1         ! beam 1 type - photon from proton
chff  = pdlabel   ! charge form factors

Please review the cards, and if there are any issues, please let me know.

Thank you in advance!
Michael

# Minimum and maximum invariant mass for pairs *
#*********************************************************************
0.0 = mmbb ! min invariant mass of a b pair
50.0 = mmll ! min invariant mass of leptons
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's the reason to require mmll=50 here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@menglu21
Copy link
Collaborator

menglu21 commented Dec 7, 2022

Hi @michael-pitt another minor question is that have you had any expectation on the pdf uncertainty, since the current pdf list of UL doesn't include many qed pdf

@michael-pitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

michael-pitt commented Jan 15, 2023

Hi @menglu21

I've changed the cards. Previously we were using pdf-based photon fluxes, which are incorrect if one uses proton tagging or rapidity gaps to identify photon-induced processes.
A recent MadGraph implementation of the correction factors was introduced in 2207.03012 and will become available in MG3.5.0 for elastic case only (photons from protons using lpp=2).

I prepared in advance cards in 4 folders:
Elastic tautau production with a mass cut of 50 or 300 GeV (two folders)
Elastic-Inelastic and Inelastic-Elastic with mtautau>50 GeV cut (two folders)

The Elastic-Inelastic need to be debugged (fails during generate_events pilotrun), but the first two cards are now used in the analysis.

The cards can run with older MadGraph releases if one switches off the corrections by changing pdlabel from edff to none in the run_card.dat.

One can assign systematic uncertainty on the photon flux by changing pdlabel between edff and chff, I will cross-check with authors if this is the right way to do it.

Regards,
Michael

@michael-pitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a followup on the error with Inelastic cards. I uploaded a card for fully inelastic gammagamma->tautau production (both photons taken from pdf). Unfortunately, the following command works only with mg265UL but not with the latest branches (tested with mg27x and mg33x), complaining about LHAPDF:

./gridpack_generation.sh GGToTauTau_Inelastic_M_50GeV_TuneCP5_madgraphLO_reweight cards/production/13TeV/GammaGammaToTauTau/GGToTauTau_Inelastic_M_50GeV_TuneCP5_madgraphLO_reweight/

@menglu21
Copy link
Collaborator

menglu21 commented Feb 1, 2023

Hi @michael-pitt so currently only fully inelastic cards have issue? what's the error, I can't test since i don't have the model

@sihyunjeon
Copy link
Collaborator

you can't have tau > all all in madspin since SMEFT model does not treat mesons as a stable particle. you have to let pythia do the rest (or tauola).

also drll 0.4 is a bit tight as your analysis level will likely give the same cut for the leptons. for better (or realistic) modelling, it would be better to set this to 0

@michael-pitt michael-pitt changed the base branch from mg265UL to master July 12, 2023 12:40
@michael-pitt michael-pitt changed the base branch from master to mg265UL July 12, 2023 12:40
@michael-pitt michael-pitt changed the base branch from mg265UL to master July 12, 2023 12:45
@michael-pitt michael-pitt force-pushed the GGToTauTau_Inclusive branch 2 times, most recently from ed88172 to 22e9689 Compare July 12, 2023 15:15
@michael-pitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is currently waiting for two issues to be solved:

Once it is done, then we can proceed with this RP.

Thanks, Michael

@bbilin
Copy link
Collaborator

bbilin commented Mar 6, 2024

We keep this one open, until we manage to get MG3.5 available soon.

@Saptaparna
Copy link
Contributor

Since the analysts are giving a talk right now, I was wondering if the MG3.5 or MG3.X branch is ready to use and have the analysts tried updating to it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants