Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0] [IMP] account_reconcile_oca: adds reference field on reconcile form view #715

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ByteMeAsap
Copy link

This PR adds the reference on the reconcile screen for the users to be able to see additional info for the bank statement lines without having to open the bank statement line move

Bank Statement Line Form VIew

Reference info on reconcile screen

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @etobella,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@yvaucher
Copy link
Member

The downside here to me is that the user may be confused on what the difference is between a Reference and a Label

Especially when Label is a reference.

I think that using better field labels could help to disambiguate the fields by being more explicit.

@ByteMeAsap
Copy link
Author

The downside here to me is that the user may be confused on what the difference is between a Reference and a Label

Especially when Label is a reference.

I think that using better field labels could help to disambiguate the fields by being more explicit.

@yvaucher , can you suggest what the field labels should be?

@yvaucher
Copy link
Member

yvaucher commented Oct 2, 2024

Just a thought, I didn't push the request changes button.

Would it be better to have the payment ref called "Payment ref" explicitly?

@ByteMeAsap
Copy link
Author

Just a thought, I didn't push the request changes button.

Would it be better to have the payment ref called "Payment ref" explicitly?

@yvaucher , yes that seems logical to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants