Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use Linux container CPU quota #585

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

uhthomas
Copy link
Contributor

Go is not cgroup aware and by default will set GOMAXPROCS to the number of available threads, regardless of whether it is within the allocated quota. This behaviour causes high amount of CPU throttling and degraded application performance.

Fixes: #584

Go is not cgroup aware and by default will set GOMAXPROCS to the number
of available threads, regardless of whether it is within the allocated
quota. This behaviour causes high amount of CPU throttling and degraded
application performance.

Fixes: AnalogJ#584
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 26, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 31.48%. Comparing base (0febe3f) to head (cc5b414).
Report is 122 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #585      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.54%   31.48%   -1.06%     
==========================================
  Files          54       29      -25     
  Lines        3045     2763     -282     
  Branches       66        0      -66     
==========================================
- Hits          991      870     -121     
+ Misses       2018     1854     -164     
- Partials       36       39       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 31.48% <ø> (-1.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@uhthomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't really understand what codecov is unhappy about - this commit is rebased on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Scrutiny should be cgroup aware
2 participants