You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there an existing issue that is already proposing this?
I have searched the existing issues
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe it
The behavior of @nestjs/microservices while creating a new microservice app does not match the behavior expected to the regular amqplib package. So far, for a configuration as this, I've encountered this mismatch in two situations:
Passing an empty string as queue name won't create an exclusive queue with a name in the form amq.gen-cf6fXOViIyb..., instead creates one called default.
Specifying exchange and routingKey should bind the queue to the exchange, and that does not happen.
Is there an existing issue that is already proposing this?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe it
The behavior of
@nestjs/microservices
while creating a new microservice app does not match the behavior expected to the regularamqplib
package. So far, for a configuration as this, I've encountered this mismatch in two situations:amq.gen-cf6fXOViIyb...
, instead creates one calleddefault
.exchange
androutingKey
should bind the queue to the exchange, and that does not happen.Describe the solution you'd like
For the given situations:
Teachability, documentation, adoption, migration strategy
options
object.What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
With the current behavior, some basic features of RabbitMQ can be achieved out of the box. Instead, some manual tweaking is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: