Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debugger Support for .NET Core Projects #16

Open
cannorin opened this issue Oct 16, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Debugger Support for .NET Core Projects #16

cannorin opened this issue Oct 16, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cannorin
Copy link
Member

@cannorin cannorin added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 16, 2019
@cannorin cannorin self-assigned this Oct 16, 2019
@cannorin cannorin added the priority: high This is preferably to be implemented/solved first. label Nov 6, 2019
@cannorin cannorin added priority: await This depends on the development of something outside the project. and removed priority: high This is preferably to be implemented/solved first. labels Dec 7, 2019
@cannorin
Copy link
Member Author

cannorin commented Dec 7, 2019

priority:await because vimspector seems as the only viable option but neovim support haven't arrived yet.
refs:

memo:

  • netcoredebug's GDB/MI mode looks less usable than DAP mode
    • :Termdebug does not play nicely with it and is not configurable enough to fix it
    • https://github.com/cpiger/NeoDebug passes options -quiet -f --interpreter=mi2 which netcoredbg does not support
  • DAP plugin for (neo)vim is non-existent (besides vimspector)

@cannorin
Copy link
Member Author

cannorin commented Feb 5, 2020

Reminder: vimspector now has neovim support.

@cannorin cannorin removed the priority: await This depends on the development of something outside the project. label Feb 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant